Size:
- Microsoft recommends limiting content databases to 200 GB.
- Each site collection may reside in a single content database
- Thus recommend maximum size for a site collection is also 200 GB.
- Site Collections represent a monolithic security context, i.e. they do not inherit permissions from other objects.
- One object may be that a Site Collection inherits the ability to provide anonymous access from the Web Application that surrounds it.
- Site Collections inherit the authentication mechanism(s) defined by the Web App.
- Neither of these are permissions, but rather mechanical 'illities that are granted to the Site Collection by it's parent Web App.
- With Publishing Infrastructure (SharePoint Enterprise), navigation can be auto-generated based on the Site-Subsite relationships
- Automatic security trimming based user access
- Publishing based navigation doesn't cross the Site Collection boundary
- I'm not sure if this is good or bad. I'm usually building single tenant intranet sites, so this isn't a plus, but recently I've had a chance to work with a client who provides SharePoint sites to multiple tenants, and this feature is a plus.
- SharePoint 2013 brought about pinned Managed Metadata for navigation.
- Each site collection requires a copy of the pinned data, which can clutter the metadata tree.
- Security Trimming doesn't occur here
- Lists that refer to other lists only occur with in a single site collection.
- Again more of a problem for a single tenant with lots of site collections, a requirement for one collection per tenant.
- Controls that pull resources like XSLT from inside the SharePoint Web structure can't access content from other Site Collections.
- You'll need to duplicate those resources across collections.
- Master Pages must be installed in each site collection.
- Pages can't reference a master page from another collection.
So next post, more on Issues with Consolidating Site Collections.
No comments:
Post a Comment